From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10627 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2004 03:51:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10613 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 03:51:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 03:51:38 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.146.142]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CMO79443 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 06:51:35 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 03:51:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c49557$Blat.v2.2.2$23f700a0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <413E25F6.7020908@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:19:50 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <413B1435.3020102@gnu.org> <01c493ce$Blat.v2.2.2$e86fbec0@zahav.net.il> <413C6E8E.6030607@gnu.org> <01c49441$Blat.v2.2.2$ead61420@zahav.net.il> <413E25F6.7020908@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:19:50 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > For the non-native case, as I initially indicated and as an examination > of the code reveals, this macro is never used! Consequently I've in no > way motified or altered GDB's ``hardware watchpoints'' feature on those > targets. Yes, you have: your patch, when checked in, will leave no way to build a port for a target that has no hardware watchpoint support.