From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16270 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2004 05:03:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16259 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2004 05:03:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2004 05:03:47 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.146.16]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CLZ45798 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:03:43 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 05:03:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c493ce$Blat.v2.2.2$e86fbec0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <413B1435.3020102@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sun, 05 Sep 2004 09:27:17 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <413B1435.3020102@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 09:27:17 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > - procfs.c and i386v-nat.c do refer to TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS > These files should be replying on an autoconf test. Autoconf tests don't work well for a cross-compiled GDB, and probably will not work for anything but a native version of GDB. Is procfs.c used by some non-native target? In any case, I'd like to see the suggested Autoconf replacement for this before we deprecate the feature.