From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28505 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2004 03:54:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28491 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2004 03:54:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2004 03:54:37 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-198-66.inter.net.il [80.230.198.66]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CLG02837 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:53:50 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:54:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c490a0$Blat.v2.2.2$83ef9460@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: jjohnstn@redhat.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4135E722.2030401@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:13:38 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <41191D71.60204@redhat.com> <20040811171203.GA4152@nevyn.them.org> <411A7D97.50104@redhat.com> <20040818135621.GA26257@nevyn.them.org> <4123AC6E.8000300@redhat.com> <20040818193952.GA27639@nevyn.them.org> <4123B62C.6060703@redhat.com> <4135E722.2030401@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:13:38 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: Jeff Johnston , drow@false.org, > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > Eli, I'm not sure what you're looking for here: > > I'd like to see at least a couple more cases like this before I agree > > that a generalization is in order. > can you expand a little? I meant to say that I prefer not to make generalizations based on a single case. Anyway, the patch is committed now, so I don't see any reason to continue arguing about it.