From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id XMgYA8uxB2gC5T8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:12:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1745334731; bh=kMHPfHiLGEi4pfo1IGCeFJitoWLwkF9NUA4rafG6vl4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=W7UHFd4fI4wRVNsSxfLbLpdgKFnXNypL1HGkXlUexjxbV0RPa4mTsjPqHcTH/o1YO 06RrRZc4qAtoT1qIE1zY722JDFV+XC5rxksYDfEFg32zC5n/c3BPWN8u4uwvr+rtJR DB9jfNnEFbSZbTM2x2eXPco9tt7AS2qGrpwef/3w= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 020281E0C3; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:12:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Wc4HGZ5b; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=S6NNOa9n; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693BA1E0C0 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:12:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211803857BB6 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:12:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 211803857BB6 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Wc4HGZ5b; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=S6NNOa9n Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D93E3857B8C for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:10:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2D93E3857B8C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2D93E3857B8C Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1745334633; cv=none; b=tp8i+MQ7pG/KEysLKeQZL9WGqzoAw120AaeLuFWlQ1x3NI42LSaWHAl/w4qyugUqvCQLjnlvjClhwGOFiT+7lKUGtnirbENdRrz4B0O4flLoe+OEqVAvq5xoYHw3F7jLKr+/n/LGnUagDo2AXishTMdN6MdSyHi9hWeZ2sKUd1g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1745334633; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kMHPfHiLGEi4pfo1IGCeFJitoWLwkF9NUA4rafG6vl4=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Subject:To:From; b=mFwtCuCXVSHZ/3sjDNQ8mfYnE1cXh0u/gw+ziWOgwx2Pr9kkutBezlKb8lqfVqxoPmfusJzWAh9LTXx2cTL69tTa6eNcXMpUXEaJhGdfIFSXOcEQ1sX2P08PboY6GVbe24fzdbG6aVeWYweHNzwSXznuWHzGskzBgrx4KVMfZLQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D93E3857B8C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1745334632; bh=kMHPfHiLGEi4pfo1IGCeFJitoWLwkF9NUA4rafG6vl4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Wc4HGZ5bzTBLFRtp8pkisb4vtzaQKSDEYGJ8EYWafZ5FDIaCR6Rg+loIDdW5SchBN QHQvNJeH3vJyn44wSfxjKSB/L88GNk8HtmY3f2U/ExbVilR8cMjybK6D8rm+wRwWES fE+eDkfN9ZeUKyKQBsYlYffEE3Ew3N2fK8Wy2F5I= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 865531E0C3; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:10:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1745334631; bh=kMHPfHiLGEi4pfo1IGCeFJitoWLwkF9NUA4rafG6vl4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=S6NNOa9noXFJGyo/vN4pFMyQX83zK5b+qjrw+VnD0Q8uc+TLifiGqBgsIy7Ujr+13 XcFQcsTQPKCI1IBLoaauE+VACeZXQO/kq0JVEqWXzk6QhnwxqsudlvGG9OZ7M6AzoN 6d0THpzRIn2X47F2A5YMGfFR9ZOqz0QlELC3rPeI= Received: from [172.16.0.106] (96-127-217-162.qc.cable.ebox.net [96.127.217.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1EFF1E0C0; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:10:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <0114c2a7-f1d7-4449-bf9c-c11efd789af3@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:10:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Handle DWARF 5 separate debug sections To: Tom Tromey Cc: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20250323-dwz-dwarf-5-v2-v1-0-3c0775ca5514@tromey.com> <20250323-dwz-dwarf-5-v2-v1-2-3c0775ca5514@tromey.com> <87o6xqgxid.fsf@tromey.com> <874iz548dq.fsf@tromey.com> <871ptk8cv4.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <871ptk8cv4.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 4/22/25 10:55 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: >>>>>> "Alexandra" == Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova writes: > Alexandra> I tested this on aarch64, Fedora 40 and this change causes > Alexandra> gdb.base/bp-cmds-continue-ctrl-c.exp to fail. I can provide > Alexandra> you with the logs if you are interested. > > Tom> Sure, that may be helpful. > Tom> I have no idea why this patch would affect that, unless maybe you were > Tom> testing the new mode? > > Tom> Hi, I wanted to land this series, but I need to investigate this first. > Tom> Could you send me this log? > > Ping. > > Tom FWIW, I think it's pretty likely that it's a flaky test. I think you can go ahead and push your series. If it turns out it's really a bug, we can always fix it later. Simon