From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17875 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 10:50:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 17867 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 10:50:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,KHOP_THREADED,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:50:34 +0000 Received: from md14.u-strasbg.fr (md14.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.249]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id q3KAo3oT058506 ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:50:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms13.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.204.113]) by md14.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id q3KAo3SO014081 ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:50:03 +0200 Received: from E6510Muller (gw-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id q3KAo2Od029054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:50:02 +0200 (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "'Joel Brobecker'" Cc: , References: <20120420015817.GA7169@sourceware.org> <4F90C4F7.10302@codesourcery.com> <20120420043807.GI2852@adacore.com> <83d372ivjh.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83d372ivjh.fsf@gnu.org> Subject: RE: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <00bc01cd1ee3$57938eb0$06baac10$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00669.txt.bz2 > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Eli Zaretskii > Envoy=E9=A0: vendredi 20 avril 2012 11:48 > =C0=A0: Joel Brobecker > Cc=A0: yao@codesourcery.com; gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: Re: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012 >=20 > > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:38:07 -0700 > > From: Joel Brobecker > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > In this particular case, I kind of agree with the warning, but > > at the same time, I don't really see why we should necessarily > > ban the use of the "inline" keyword. I'm actually considering > > the idea of getting rid of this ARI rule. > > > > Any opinion on this topic? >=20 > Absolutely, the warning should be tossed. There's nothing wrong with > using it. I have no opinion on the removal of this rule, I would just like to be sure that, if we allow to use inline function, the configure step will correctly define inline as nothing on systems using compilers that do not support inline functions. Does anyone know if this is done inside GDB configuration step? =20=20 Pierre Muller As un-official GDB ARI maintainer ...