From: "Nick Kelsey" <nickk@ubicom.com>
To: "Andrew Cagney" <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Sumbitting ip2k port for review.
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <008d01c2a2cb$2c23ce00$0a00a8c0@nkelseyhome> (raw)
Re: Sumbitting ip2k port for review.
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Nick Kelsey <nickk at ubicom dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:01:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Sumbitting ip2k port for review.
>The other question is who contributed to this work? `Java at silicondust'
appears to have being doing some stuff >(or is that your alter ego?). I
believe David Taylor may have also worked on the file ip2k-tdep.c in the
past? I >know that the problems he encountered with the ip2k were one of the
motivations behind overhauling pseudo->registers.
jafa at silicondust is me also.
Rigisters, right. The ip2k has a lot of registers (about 384) and many of
them need to be combined and processed to give a useful user display. If you
take a took at ip2k-registers.h and remote-ip2k.c you will see the current
hack - a dummy memory address that the remote back-end builds to display
registers formatted nicely so they can be type-casted as a multi-level
structure (looks great in insight as the nodes can be colasped).
What the ip2k really needs out of the register handling is
- the ability to display a register group (there are about 12 register
groups in the ip2k).
- the ability to obtain a list of the register groups in a general way (for
use with a GUI).
- insight support.
I get the impression that insight is not under strong active development so
if we can leave the registers-structure trick in place then that would
satify the insight requirement. I am quite happy to work with whoever is
driving the changes to the register code so that the ip2k port can make use
of these features.
>- ``__'' shouldn't be avoided as a prefix to symbols. A leading `_' is
reserved for the system's namespace.
Sorry, i don't quite follow, can you give an example please. The ip2k gcc
port uses an underscore prefix for normal c-code. There are a few symbols
that the linker script creates that gdb needs if the vn is to be used. I
used a double-underscore prefix to avoid name-space issues with c-ode.
>Andrew
Thanks
Nick
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-13 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-13 9:58 Nick Kelsey [this message]
2003-01-31 6:04 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-12 15:55 Jafa
[not found] <067401c29cc8$fea5b4a0$f601a8c0@nkelseyxp>
2002-12-11 16:05 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='008d01c2a2cb$2c23ce00$0a00a8c0@nkelseyhome' \
--to=nickk@ubicom.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox