From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20833 invoked by alias); 15 May 2009 10:15:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 20814 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2009 10:15:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 10:15:09 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n4FAEJcG073019 ; Fri, 15 May 2009 12:14:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms2.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::11]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n4FAEJ8x077013 ; Fri, 15 May 2009 12:14:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (www-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n4FAEIu8016409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Fri, 15 May 2009 12:14:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "'Joel Brobecker'" Cc: References: <003601c9d4d7$30f835c0$92e8a140$@u-strasbg.fr> <83skj6rgwp.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83skj6rgwp.fsf@gnu.org> Subject: RE: [RFA] Fix my email addresses Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <008601c9d545$e982e860$bc88b920$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2 >From Eli Zaretskii > > Is this OK? > > Yes, okay. Thanks. > > Should I really add this entry to ChangeLog, > > or commit it without ChangeLog entry? > > Personally, I think that such changes don't need a ChangeLog entry, > but since my opinions about ChangeLog's are more often than not > overruled by the majority of other developers, please wait for someone > else to speak up. As Joel agreed with you, I committed the ChangeLog fix first, without adding anything on top, and committed the MAINTAINERS file patch, this time with a ChangeLog entry. Pierre