From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-48362-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31288 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2007 20:58:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 31257 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2007 20:58:25 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO mail.artimi.com) (194.72.81.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:58:22 +0100
Received: from rainbow ([192.168.8.46]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 	 Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:57:59 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'Steve Ellcey'" <sje@cup.hp.com>
Cc: <binutils@sourceware.org>, 	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	<gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	<newlib@sourceware.org>, 	<Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>, 	<aoliva@redhat.com>, 	<bonzini@gnu.org>, 	<fxcoudert@gmail.com>, 	<libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm>, 	<schwab@suse.de>
References: <006501c77bab$1753a410$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <200704102006.NAA21177@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
Subject: RE: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:58:00 -0000
Message-ID: <006a01c77bb2$ebd330f0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <200704102006.NAA21177@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2

On 10 April 2007 21:07, Steve Ellcey wrote:

>>   I appreciate the problem, but Cygwin can be a bit 'special' when it
>> comes to libtool; if it hasn't been done yet, can you possibly bear to
>> hold off a bit while I give it some hasty testing?  (By 'a bit', I mean no
>> more than say 'overnight').  Sorry to be a pain :-/
>> 
>> 
>>     cheers,
>>       DaveK
> 
> I can wait, especially since no one has given me the go ahead yet.  :-)
> I know of no cygwin testing that has been done.

  Thank you.  In progress now; I won't keep you hanging about.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....