From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6203 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2009 07:10:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 6192 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2009 07:10:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dns.vtab.com (HELO oden.vtab.com) (62.20.90.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:10:43 +0000 Received: from oden.vtab.com (oden.vtab.com [127.0.0.1]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42DC26EE4A; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:10:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polhem (unknown [62.20.90.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F13026EE6A; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:10:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "Jakob Engblom" To: "'Michael Snyder'" Cc: References: <00d001ca265a$ddd0c800$99725800$@com> <4A95DDD6.2000200@vmware.com> <010001ca2a3b$d86846b0$8938d410$@com> <031101ca2b02$7a77a1f0$6f66e5d0$@com> <4AA45F26.20105@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4AA45F26.20105@vmware.com> Subject: RE: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [3 of 3] Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <004c01ca2f8a$4f416ac0$edc44040$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 > Where do we stand with getting this contribution into 7.0? > > Is there a question about the assignment, and if so, is anyone pursuing it? Yes and Yes. I have emailed the FSF, gotten no reply. In general, what is your experience in signing these things: is it easier for Virtutech to sign in as a company? Or should we get one agreement per employee? /jakob