From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
To: "'Sérgio Durigan Júnior'" <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: "'teawater'" <teawater@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- XML support
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004901c97f90$c6019360$5204ba20$@u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232929835.26873.24.camel@miki>
Hi Sérgio,
I noticed that your ChangeLog still uses the old filenames,
but looking into the patch, I found out that it is correct,
as 'processor-syscalls.xml' files are renamed as 'processor-linux.xml'.
I had also a small question about these lines:
+ <syscall name="" number="293"/>
+ <syscall name="" number="294"/>
in 'ppc64-linux.xml'
or likewise
+ <syscall name="" number="299"/>
+ <syscall name="" number="300"/>
in 'ppc-linux.xml'
Are these lines useful, and
-if yes, what is their purpose?
-if no, why are these lines present?
Thanks for working
Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Sérgio Durigan Júnior
> Envoyé : Monday, January 26, 2009 1:31 AM
> À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Cc : teawater
> Objet : [PATCH 3/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- XML support
>
> Here goes the XML support code for the patch.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Sérgio Durigan Júnior
> Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center -
> LTC IBM Brazil
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2009-01-25 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> * syscalls/gdb-syscalls.dtd: New definition file for syscall's
> XML
> support.
> * syscalls/i386-syscalls.xml: New file for i386 syscalls.
> * syscalls/ppc-syscalls.xml: New file for PPC syscalls.
> * syscalls/ppc64-syscalls.xml: New file for PPC64 syscalls.
> * xml-syscall.c: New file containing functions for manipulating
> syscall's XML files.
> * xml-syscall.h: New file, exporting the functions above
> mentioned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-26 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-26 0:31 Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2009-01-26 8:33 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2009-01-28 13:23 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2009-02-01 19:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004901c97f90$c6019360$5204ba20$@u-strasbg.fr' \
--to=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox