This is the third ping. It has been three weeks since I posted the
following patch...
Would anyone review it?

Kei Sakamoto

From: "Kei Sakamoto" <sakamoto.kei@renesas.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 6:03 PM
Subject: [RFA/m32r] Unreviewed patch (breakpoint bug)


> This is the second ping.
> Please review the following patch.
> 
> Kei Sakamoto
> 
> From: "Kei Sakamoto" <sakamoto.kei@renesas.com>
> To: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:43 PM
> Subject: [RFA/m32r] Unreviewed patch (breakpoint bug)
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Would anyone review this patch?
> > Thank you in advance.
> > 
> > Kei Sakamoto
> > 
> > From: "Kei Sakamoto" <sakamoto.kei@renesas.com>
> > To: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 3:31 PM
> > Subject: [RFA/m32r] Fix breakpoint bug
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > m32r-tdep.c can't handle breakpoints on instructions executed
> > > in parallel. It does not remove unnecessary parallel execution
> > > bit from instructions and causes illegal instruction errors.
> > > 
> > > The attached patch fixes this problem.
> > > 
> > > OK to commit?
> > > 
> > > 2004-10-07    Kei Sakamoto  <sakamoto.kei@renesas.com>
> > > 
> > >     * m32r-tdep.c (m32r_memory_insert_breakpoint): Remove
> > >     unnecessary parallel execution bit.
> > >     (m32r_memory_remove_breakpoint): Ditto.
> > >     (m32r_breakpoint_from_pc): Update.