From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21622 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2008 07:56:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 21613 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Oct 2008 07:56:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dns.vtab.com (HELO oden.vtab.com) (62.20.90.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:55:20 +0000 Received: from oden.vtab.com (oden.vtab.com [127.0.0.1]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B184826EF3E for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:55:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polhem (polhem.hq.vtech [10.0.0.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CAE26EF39 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:55:15 +0200 (CEST) From: "Jakob Engblom" To: References: <48EC1781.2030005@vmware.com> <48EF93A5.7060808@vmware.com> <20081010175332.GA9028@caradoc.them.org> <48EFA065.5070108@vmware.com> <20081010185808.GA12193@caradoc.them.org> <48EFCFEE.3090007@vmware.com> <48F39ED3.8080603@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <48F39ED3.8080603@vmware.com> Subject: RE: [RFA] Resubmit, reverse debugging [0/5] Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <003f01c92dd2$32944650$97bcd2f0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: sv X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 Hi! This is Virtutech weighing in, since our use and implementation of reversib= ility in gbd-serial has come up. We are perfectly fine with the commands changin= g a little, it is as people have noted not a particularly big deal what the pre= cise gdb-serial commands are, as long as they get decided on and remain fixed. = Which is exactly why we like the current process of finally seeing reverse execut= ion become part of the gdb mainline.=20 "bc" and "bs" are tried and tested as far as we are concerned, and they app= ear to be still in place from what I can see.=20 I have another question here: is there a way to check if the remote target = does support reverse execution? Not all targets will, in our experience. So havi= ng some way to detect that property of the target is quite useful.=20 Best regards, /jakob _______________________________________________________ Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager Virtutech Direct: +46 8 690 07 47=20=20=20=20 Drottningholmsv=E4gen 14 Mobile: +46 709 242 646=20=20=20 11243 Stockholm Web: www.virtutech.com=20=20 Sweden ________________________________________________________ =20