From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11113 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2009 11:15:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 11105 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2009 11:15:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:15:49 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n98BF3ir080457 ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:15:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms2.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::11]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n98BF3Qv004177 ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:15:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (gw-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n98BF20s062863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:15:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Joel Brobecker'" Cc: References: <001801c9c397$0e35ba90$2aa12fb0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090423184213.GE7552@adacore.com> <013401c9ca3e$852e58c0$8f8b0a40$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090506163051.GL10734@adacore.com> <001d01c9ce6a$1d6d7e20$58487a60$@u-strasbg.fr> <001001c9d85c$940312b0$bc093810$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090520052257.GB16152@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20090520052257.GB16152@adacore.com> Subject: RE: [RFC] Send new ARI warnings to gdb_testers mailing list Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <003401ca4808$96fd2070$c4f76150$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 Hi,=20 sorry for answering so late on this email. Joel, do you still agree on=20 moving the email-to address to gdb-testers? > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: Joel Brobecker [mailto:brobecker@adacore.com] > Envoy=E9=A0: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:23 AM > =C0=A0: Pierre Muller > Cc=A0: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: Re: [RFC] Send new ARI warnings to gdb_testers mailing list >=20 > FWIW: >=20 > > >>>>>>>>>> Email Title > > ARI warning list change Tue May 19 01:55:11 UTC 2009 > > >>>>>>>>>> Start of email body > > 1049a1046,1047 > > > gdb/lm32-tdep.c:293: deprecate: write_memory: Replace > write_memory() with > > regcache_read() et.al. > > > gdb/lm32-tdep.c:337: deprecate: read_memory: Replace read_memory() > with > > regcache_read() et.al. > > 58,59d57 > > < gdb/doublest.h:96: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not > use > > deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details > > < gdb/doublest.h:97: deprecated: deprecated store_floating: Do not > use > > deprecated store_floating, see declaration for details > > 106d103 > > < gdb/ada-lang.c:1695: deprecated: deprecated set_value_type: Do not > use > > deprecated set_value_type, see declaration for details > > 163d159 > > < gdb/sh64-tdep.c:1580: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do > not use > > deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details > > 1600,1601d1597 > > < gdb/doublest.c:822: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not > use > > deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details > > < gdb/doublest.c:839: deprecated: deprecated store_floating: Do not > use > > deprecated store_floating, see declaration for details > > >>>>>>>>>> End of email >=20 > Can we just get the lines that start with "> "? As far as I can tell, > we don't really need the "< " lines, since these are good news. > The hunk headers (eg: 1600,1601d1597) are not really useful either. I have to disagree here: In some cases, the new warning might just be due to a change of the ordering of the source (for instance if you move a function). In such a case, you would be able to understand that it is not a really new warning, but a displaced by looking at the > > Should I change the email address to gdb-testers? >=20 > I would personally be OK with that; and I even think that this would > be useful if all we were sending is the new regressions. Having > the line number where the regression appeared is great. Pierre