RE: [RFA] gdb_ari.sh changes to discard some file types for specific tests

["Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>]

Thanks!

  I have more changes, especially
related to doscheck.c
(which is not used on the web pages,
but probably should be enabled again.)
  I changed the output of doscheck to
avoid getting false duplicates for files
in different directories.

  The next question is for Eli, as DJGPP maintainer:
  I have locally a working version of doscheck,
which avoid duplicates in different directories,
but still reveals some conflicts for DJGPP.
  The most notable is
gdb/ChangeLog and gdb/ChangeLog-2006
but there are others in bfd, libdecnumber, gdb/testsuite
and other directories,
  but lots of these duplicates are probably
in directories that are not even put in
the DJGPP gdb sources.

  Should I send the whole list,
or should we start by updating the
directory exclusion list in update_web_ari?

  By the way, is the script that
generates the DJGPP gdb source public?
If yes, where can I find it?

Pierre

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:25 PM
> To: Pierre Muller
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb_ari.sh changes to discard some file types for
> specific tests
> 
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:41:34PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >   UCASE and EditCase tests are currently polluted
> > by lex and yacc files.
> >   This patch discards those bugs if the source
> > is a lex or yacc source.
> >   The patch also contains the fixes for xasprintf and xvasprintf
> > that I already proposed yesterday.
> >
> >   I am new to AWK scripts,
> > so I am unsure if my changes are
> > standard.
> >
> > Is this OK?
> 
> I checked in something similar - we shouldn't be looking at lex/yacc
> output files at all.
> 
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery