From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27282-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4970 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2003 01:20:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4923 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 01:20:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hub.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 01:20:08 -0000
Received: from smtp.ott.qnx.com (smtp.ott.qnx.com [10.0.2.158])
	by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA30181;
	Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:18:18 -0400
Received: from dash ([192.168.20.33]) by smtp.ott.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA24901; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:20:06 -0400
Message-ID: <002601c3823a$209cd910$6400a8c0@dash>
From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
To: "Elena Zannoni" <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
References: <Pine.CYG.4.55.0309161441150.1008@catdog.ott.qnx.com> <16240.46973.557418.422147@localhost.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] fix for PR:1291
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:20:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2

> kewarken writes:
>  > Credit to inaba@src.ricoh.co.jp for his original find and patch and to
>  > Colin Burgess for noting the differences between gcc 2 and 3.
>  >
>  > ChangeLog:
>  >
>  > 2003-09-16  Kris Warkentin  <kewarken@qnx.com>
>  >
>  > * sh-tdep.c: Properly detect frame prologues for functions with
>  > more than 256 bytes of local variables.
>
> You should give credit to these folks in the changelog entry.

Certainly.

> I wonder if this can be captured in a test case?  How does your change
> interacts with Corinna's rewrite?

I'll take a look at it when I have some more time next week.  The test case
is very simple so I can easily check to see if Corinna's stuff fixes it.
Unfortunately my available gdb cycles have been extremely low lately since
we have a lot of critical internal stuff that I've been grabbed for.

cheers,

Kris