From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9068 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2004 14:57:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8816 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 14:57:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.12.11.35) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 14:57:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Kindrogan) (compxsuk@81.136.112.227 with login) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 14:56:59 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Jon Beniston" To: "'Richard Earnshaw'" Cc: Subject: RE: [PATCH] Output execution stats from ARM simulator Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:57:00 -0000 Organization: CompXs Message-ID: <002301c4d623$6178e990$0bbda8c0@Kindrogan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <1101739601.1585.44.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2 > > > > 2004-11-29 Jon Beniston > > > > * wrapper.c (sim_info): Output number of instructions > > executed and number of cycles taken to execute them. > > While I don't see anything wrong with your patch, I'm not > sure whether that information is accurately tracked any more. > So the numbers probably aren't meaningful, especially for > any core other than an ARM7 (and I don't mean an ARM7TDMI either). I can understand cycles not being valid (as this surely is core specific), but I take it the number of instructions executed should be? Cheers, Jon