From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-68771-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21602 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2009 16:53:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 21592 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2009 16:53:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_05,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.151)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:53:20 +0000
Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41])            by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id nB5GqcW7005018            ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:52:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr)
Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms2.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::11])            by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id nB5GqbaV030531            ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:52:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr)
Received: from d620muller (lec67-4-82-230-53-140.fbx.proxad.net [82.230.53.140]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN)           by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id nB5GqZF1002938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)           ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:52:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr)
From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: <Hilfinger@adacore.com>, <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: <brobecker@adacore.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
References: <20091204081343.A8718227B32@nile.gnat.com> <m3zl5yegg8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20091205121800.DB060227B32@nile.gnat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091205121800.DB060227B32@nile.gnat.com>
Subject: RE: [RFA] 64-bit range types in GDB
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <002101ca75cb$60c207a0$224616e0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2

> > Paul> +         _("Suspicious DW_AT_byte_size value treated as zero
> instead of 0x%llx"),
> > Paul> +         (long long) DW_UNSND (attr));
> >
> > Are %ll and `long long' really portable?  I think you need something
> > else here.  There are a few cases.


  You shouldn't use %ll
as this would degenerate ARI regressions.

Please use %s with plongest or pulongest functions
from utils.c

  Otherwise, I really like the idea of your patch to
remove the 32bit limitation for ranges!

Pierre Muller
as ARI "maintainer"...