From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-130054-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24743 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2016 23:20:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 24728 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2016 23:20:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-pf0-f202.google.com
Received: from mail-pf0-f202.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f202.google.com) (209.85.192.202) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 23:20:09 +0000
Received: by mail-pf0-f202.google.com with SMTP id q129so480024pfb.1        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:20:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:cc;        bh=gYtr52kGvUicCWn6q/W8l/IWfhltl9HHj5FuslI52lg=;        b=k0dt9Tv1oVrD0z7yMqX9x4kGa5p7+Fj8w4DwlDNGPn96HubexAnRslL3nwInFUKVru         F6rN6IzoZ9Q0zOH40gBm+QuN1+ry3tl1rxFljLcRpTearuWalLzwVuqVucJjYdljECXG         AYaRK5cfgNr+c/DM9klRKGGkixnrOprNBl1P7u1nOEN9s1ZJy74ETPjqc9+P1xbm4KrV         ezdGr5euasZ43QPniiVlM+q2NsOATrn66Sf/bPFMlPBoTXNCGRoOVc6ZblPEnrJKjyFo         FmWkmXMmolPHV5l4pEb4/btHHdn0PXA2VzpXnWhjEpMCVpplGHl4kpK1wmyzMs2vUv0C         OQ0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKKYYZqqexExv2Y1qOvyz/9b49xny1lIPP++qUoIa8ZncFJ/Wk57rOIa2m9Ub72QpQjzA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.98.1.81 with SMTP id 78mr963317pfb.1.1456960807371; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <001a1145617e604203052d191f01@google.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 23:20:00 -0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Add "skip regexp"
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, <eliz@gnu.org>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2

Simon Marchi writes:
  > On 16-02-16 08:07 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
  > > +# Test -fi + -fu.
  > > +
  > > +if ![runto_main] {
  > > +    fail "Can't run to main"
  > > +    return
  > > +}
  > > +
  > > +set test "step using -fi + -fu"
  > > +gdb_test_no_output "skip delete"
  > > +gdb_test "skip -fi skip1.c -fu test_skip" \
  > > +    "Function test_skip in file skip1.c will be skipped when  
stepping\."
  > > +gdb_breakpoint "test_skip_file_and_function"
  > > +gdb_breakpoint "end_test_skip_file_and_function"
  > > +gdb_test "call test_skip_file_and_function ()" "silently stop."
  >
  > Hi Doug,
  >
  > I just saw a failure of this test on a target that doesn't have inferior  
calls.  It
  > seems to me like the function call isn't fundamental to the test and it  
could be
  > avoided by organizing things differently.  What do you think?
  >
  > Otherwise, we would need to add a
  >
  >   if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {

Bleah, righto.

Fix forthcoming.
I need to cleanup skip.exp first.