----- Original Message -----
From: "Zaretskii Eli" <ezaretski@elta.co.il>
To: "Elena Zannoni" <ezannoni@redhat.com>; "Raoul Gough"
<RaoulGough@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:08 AM
Subject: RE: [RFA] DLLs without debugging symbols (repost)
> > From: Elena Zannoni [mailto:ezannoni@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:00 AM
> >
> > The texinfo stuff should be approved by Eli. Mybe post it as a
> > separate [RFA/doco] message, it will be more likely to be noticed.
>
> Sorry, I did miss the original message.
>
> The doco patch is approved, but please put "kernel32.dll" inside
@file.

Done (new diff attached).

>
> Also, please use "---" (three dashes in a row) instead of just "-"
when
> you want an em-dash in the manual.

Also done (assuming an em-dash is one of them free-standing ones,
rather than one in a compound word).

>
> Symbol names such as ``KERNEL32!CreateFileA'' should be in @code
(and
> without the quotes).

Done.

>
> Instead of "(see @ref{Symbols})", please use "(@pxref{Symbols})".

Done.

>
> Finally, I suggest some @cindex entry about symbol names in
non-debug
> DLLs somewhere in the text.  Users might look for this information
in
> the index.

You might have missed the one I already had ("DLLs with no debugging
symbols") but I've added another one for good (?) measure - "Minimal
symbols and DLLs"

>
> Thanks!

Thank you!

Regards,
Raoul Gough.