From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5365 invoked by alias); 21 May 2010 16:22:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 5353 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2010 16:22:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.157) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 16:22:30 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id o4LGMD2r071093 ; Fri, 21 May 2010 18:22:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms2.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::11]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id o4LGMCEA037094 ; Fri, 21 May 2010 18:22:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) Received: from d620muller (gw-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id o4LGMCEr036149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Fri, 21 May 2010 18:22:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: Cc: References: <10524.3587088355$1274389681@news.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PING] [RFC] Extend gdb_ari.sh with ARI_OFF/ARI_ON Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <001301caf901$c91e2540$5b5a6fc0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cr-hashedpuzzle: fVY= A424 Cyje CyuZ E/BD FaLg Fp9j JpQL J1Tr KdJm KvhP QS3b QdbA SJG3 TCWC UFPI;2;ZwBkAGIALQBwAGEAdABjAGgAZQBzAEAAcwBvAHUAcgBjAGUAdwBhAHIAZQAuAG8AcgBnADsAdAByAG8AbQBlAHkAQAByAGUAZABoAGEAdAAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Sosha1_v1;7;{9344028D-5B91-4D2D-AA5A-4D190D6F7A44};cABpAGUAcgByAGUALgBtAHUAbABsAGUAcgBAAGkAYwBzAC0AYwBuAHIAcwAuAHUAbgBpAHMAdAByAGEALgBmAHIA;Fri, 21 May 2010 16:22:13 GMT;UgBFADoAIABbAFAASQBOAEcAXQAgAFsAUgBGAEMAXQAgAEUAeAB0AGUAbgBkACAAZwBkAGIAXwBhAHIAaQAuAHMAaAAgAHcAaQB0AGgAIABBAFIASQBfAE8ARgBGAC8AQQBSAEkAXwBPAE4A x-cr-puzzleid: {9344028D-5B91-4D2D-AA5A-4D190D6F7A44} Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 > I think this kind of mechanism is too obscure. The markers may be very > far from the place that one is editing. > > Do we really need this particular ARI rule at all? This sort of > problem > is usually caught by patch review... and if it an instance is missed, > it > doesn't have any impact on code quality. OK, I get your point, and you are not the first one taking that position. Let's drop this also, proposal officially withdrawn. I will try to work further on more ARI if I find time... but will try to focus on more essential points. Pierre