From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25159 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2009 08:34:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 25151 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2009 08:34:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dns.vtab.com (HELO oden.vtab.com) (62.20.90.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:34:20 +0000 Received: from oden.vtab.com (oden.vtab.com [127.0.0.1]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AF426EF72; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:34:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from polhem (unknown [62.20.90.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B76726EF66; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:34:16 +0100 (CET) From: "Jakob Engblom" To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "'Michael Snyder'" Cc: , , References: <4AEDF9F4.9040207@vmware.com> <834opec530.fsf@gnu.org> <4AEE27E9.1070005@vmware.com> <831vkhd18a.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <831vkhd18a.fsf@gnu.org> Subject: RE: [RFA] replay bookmarks Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <001101ca5c60$7220f9e0$5662eda0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 > > >> Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:13:24 -0800 > > >> From: Michael Snyder > > >> > > >> + add_com ("bookmark", class_bookmark, save_bookmark_command, _("\ > > >> +Set a bookmark.\n\ > > > > > > This is way too short. Suggest to expand a bit: > > > > > > Set a bookmark in the inferior's execution history > > > > > >> + add_com ("goto-bookmark", class_bookmark, goto_bookmark_command, _("\ > > >> +Go to bookmark \n\ > > > > > > Similarly here: such a short description is hardly useful, as it just > > > repeats the name of the command. > > > > How about this? > > Fine with me. > > There are a few instances of user messages where the text is not > marked by _(). > > Also, we will need an update for the manual, once this is approved. Also, will this add corresponding operations to gdb-serial? That is necessary to get this working for undodb, Simics, and similar remote-exec bookmarkable targets. I guess that also means VMWare, right? /jakob