From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25939 invoked by alias); 19 May 2009 08:35:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 25929 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2009 08:35:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_22,J_CHICKENPOX_42 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 08:34:57 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n4J8YAOL020189 ; Tue, 19 May 2009 10:34:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms3.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::12]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n4J8YAH3002020 ; Tue, 19 May 2009 10:34:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (www-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n4J8Y9Ui028985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Tue, 19 May 2009 10:34:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Pierre Muller'" , "'Joel Brobecker'" Cc: References: <001801c9c397$0e35ba90$2aa12fb0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090423184213.GE7552@adacore.com> <013401c9ca3e$852e58c0$8f8b0a40$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090506163051.GL10734@adacore.com> <001d01c9ce6a$1d6d7e20$58487a60$@u-strasbg.fr> In-Reply-To: <001d01c9ce6a$1d6d7e20$58487a60$@u-strasbg.fr> Subject: RE: [RFC] Send new ARI warnings to gdb_testers mailing list Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <001001c9d85c$940312b0$bc093810$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00393.txt.bz2 Here is an update on this issue. Since I added this feature, I received 6 emails. 2 of them where due to the 6.8 branch that got additional warnings due to my changes to gdb_ari.sh 1 email was about more use of gdbarch methods, which of course is not of interest here. I improved the checks about failure in update-web-ari 1) I removed all gdbarch category warnings, as they are not=20 relevant here. 2) I used sed to replace the lines with zero'ed line numbers by the original lines of the gdb_ari.sh script. The last email I got is this: >>>>>>>>>> Email Title ARI warning list change Tue May 19 01:55:11 UTC 2009 >>>>>>>>>> Start of email body 1049a1046,1047 > gdb/lm32-tdep.c:293: deprecate: write_memory: Replace write_memory() with regcache_read() et.al. > gdb/lm32-tdep.c:337: deprecate: read_memory: Replace read_memory() with regcache_read() et.al. 58,59d57 < gdb/doublest.h:96: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not use deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details=20 < gdb/doublest.h:97: deprecated: deprecated store_floating: Do not use deprecated store_floating, see declaration for details=20 106d103 < gdb/ada-lang.c:1695: deprecated: deprecated set_value_type: Do not use deprecated set_value_type, see declaration for details 163d159 < gdb/sh64-tdep.c:1580: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not use deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details 1600,1601d1597 < gdb/doublest.c:822: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not use deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details=20 < gdb/doublest.c:839: deprecated: deprecated store_floating: Do not use deprecated store_floating, see declaration for details >>>>>>>>>> End of email Should I change the email address to gdb-testers? Pierre Muller trying to improve ARI stuff. > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Pierre Muller > Envoy=E9=A0: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 6:46 PM > =C0=A0: 'Joel Brobecker' > Cc=A0: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: RE: [RFC] Send new ARI warnings to gdb_testers mailing list >=20 > I just committed this with my email address > and will inform you of the first results I get. >=20 > Pierre >=20 > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De=A0: Joel Brobecker [mailto:brobecker@adacore.com] > > Envoy=E9=A0: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 6:31 PM > > =C0=A0: Pierre Muller > > Cc=A0: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Objet=A0: Re: [RFC] Send new ARI warnings to gdb_testers mailing list > > > > > The only drawback is that the line number also does not appear > > > on the generated email... > > > > Initially, I thought that this was a pretty significant drawback. > > But I tried to come up with a way of isolating the new line, and > > I'm not sure whether this is possible or not. The problem is that > > the line number associated to an error/warning can change from > > day to day, as we modify the source around it. > > > > We could try your current approach, and see if that helps or not... > > Why not activating your change, but with yourself as the the only > > recipient, as opposed to gdb-testers? That will allow you to > determine > > the frequency of such messages, as we as how difficult it is to > > determine which entry is the new one... > > > > -- > > Joel