From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 73888 invoked by alias); 2 May 2015 22:46:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 73879 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2015 22:46:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailhost.u-strasbg.fr Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.222.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 May 2015 22:46:36 +0000 Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antispam (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69971C229B; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:46:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C36C22AB; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:46:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmr.u-strasbg.fr (lmr4.u-strasbg.fr [172.30.21.4]) by mr3.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1797EC229B; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmr.u-strasbg.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79DDB4; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:46:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from E6510Muller (lec67-4-82-230-53-140.fbx.proxad.net [82.230.53.140]) (Authenticated sender: mullerp) by lmr4.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B843EC; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:46:25 +0200 (CEST) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Doug Evans'" , "'Joel Brobecker'" Cc: "'gdb-patches'" References: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> <20150422171434.GL4764@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 22:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000c01d08529$d287c190$779744b0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Hi Doug, thanks for the approval, I just committed the series to gdb-7.9-branch https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2015-05/msg00001.html By the way, my patches in trunk were applied on top of your fix from April = 6. 2015. concerning lib/pascal.exp=20 https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=3Dbinutils-gdb.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h= =3D01b622d4c7536f20622bc0e23ff78b7fe37bc1e3 It would seem logical to also merge your fix. Joel, you mentioned something about NEWS entry? Does a fix in 7.9.1 need a NEWS entry in that branch, even if it has no NEWS entry in trunk? Pierre Muller > -----Message d'origine----- > De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Doug Evans > Envoy=C3=A9 : samedi 2 mai 2015 17:34 > =C3=80 : Joel Brobecker > Cc : Pierre Muller; gdb-patches > Objet : Re: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? >=20 > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Joel Brobecker > wrote: > >> Would the patch to gdb/p-exp.y that fixes issue PR 127815 > >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17815 > >> > >> be acceptable without the testsuite change? > >> > >> This patch was accepted recently by Doug, and committed to trunk. > >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00735.html > >> > >> The patch [part 1/3] itself is at: > >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00111.html > >> > >> Or would the application of the three parts of the patch be more > acceptable? > >> The two other parts are at: > >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00112.html > >> and > >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00113.html > > > > It's mostly your's and Doug's decision. The general idea is to > > only take patches that are safe and fix an important issue. But > > if it's only affecting Pascal, then we can be a little more > > relaxed about it. >=20 > Agreed. > I think this and the tests can go into the branch. >=20 > > Regarding the testsuite patches, since they cannot harm the debugger, > > they should be part of the set being considered for inclusion in > > the gdb-7.9-branch. > > > > If the decision is to include the patch, please remember to update > > the wiki page as well! > > > > -- > > Joel