From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11410 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2009 13:41:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 11399 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2009 13:41:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.157) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:41:10 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n68Df3SH037309 ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:41:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms1.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::10]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n68Df3j2056047 ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:41:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (www-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n68Df3Yp079661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:41:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Pedro Alves'" Cc: References: <000001c9ffce$8b9b81e0$a2d285a0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200907081423.14012.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000301c9ffcf$ecec6bc0$c6c54340$@u-strasbg.fr> <200907081436.35386.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200907081436.35386.pedro@codesourcery.com> Subject: RE: [RFA] Add "inf" alias for "info" Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000601c9ffd1$bca35bc0$35ea1340$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2 > I'm sure that you'll now get used to "i" in no time, now > that you know it. Not that sure... But I still think that the patch will be useful to others.. > This revealed an interesting issue. The > > 'Ambiguous command "inf reg": inferior, info.' > > ... message doesn't indicate the aliases of each alternative > command. Neither does "help info" mention "i". Maybe it should. > > (btw, "i" + "inf" would leave "in" in a weird spot) But "in " was ambiguous before you added "inferior", that is why I did not add it to the patch. Nobody using a recent gdb could have used "in " like she/he could have used "inf ". Pierre