From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3257 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2009 05:05:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 3241 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2009 05:05:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:05:03 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n5A54rOC084507 ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:04:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms3.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::12]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n5A54r3f022044 ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:04:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (lec67-4-82-230-53-140.fbx.proxad.net [82.230.53.140]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n5A54q0S007630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:04:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Doug Evans'" Cc: "'Pedro Alves'" , References: <20090430071853.99F5584890@localhost> <001201c9d860$e66c5850$b34508f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <000301c9e3d4$218eac20$64ac0460$@u-strasbg.fr> <002001c9e468$273842a0$75a8c7e0$@u-strasbg.fr> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [RFA] i386/amd64 h/w watchpoints in gdbserver Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000601c9e988$ff5dc810$fe195830$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Doug Evans > Envoy=E9=A0: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 5:43 AM > =C0=A0: Pierre Muller > Cc=A0: Pedro Alves; gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: Re: [RFA] i386/amd64 h/w watchpoints in gdbserver >=20 > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Pierre Muller > wrote: > >> Thanks for running the tests. > >> How about watchthreads.exp, watchthreads2.exp? > > > > [...] > > Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp ... > > FAIL: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: threaded watch loop > > FAIL: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: combination of threaded > watchpoints =3D 30 > > Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/watchthreads2.exp ... > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D gdb Summary =3D=3D=3D > > > > # of expected passes =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0116 > > # of unexpected failures =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02 > > # of known failures =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1 > > /usr/local/src/gdbcvs/build/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version > > 6.8.50.20090602 > > -cvs -nw -nx > > > > make: *** [check] Error 1 > > > > I got the same results with cygwin gdb itself... > > > > I am currently investigating the two failures > > above and I will come back to this in another email. >=20 > Hi. For clarification, are these failures regressions, or do the > tests still fail without the patch? Not really, as these two tests are only run if the target supports hardware watchpoints. This means that current gdbserver from CVS HEAD would skip that test. Anyhow, I think that there are problems with the gdb.threads/watchthreads2.c code with cygwin. When run directly, this code should write a bunch of thread switches and exit, but I seems to freeze... Pierre