From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30423 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2011 05:42:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 30073 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2011 05:42:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:41:58 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1R5t5g-0001RD-Og from Vladimir_Prus@mentor.com ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:41:56 -0700 Received: from 192.94.38.247 ([192.94.38.247]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.20.52]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:41:55 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:09:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [RFA 1/3] [Ada] New GDB/MI command: -ada-tasks-info Message-ID: <000401cc7758$01842180$f7265ec0@mgc.mentorg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Prus, Vladimir" To: "Joel Brobecker" , "Vladimir Prus" Cc: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 OK. In that case, I have no more comments.=20 Joel Brobecker wrote: > I don't have any questions about the implementation, but I do wonder > whether reusing "info os xxx" mechanism might be better here, e.g.: >=20 > info os ada-tasks I don't think it makes sense in this case. I could see system-wide queries, or os-specific commands to use that prefix. But I don't see how the list of Ada tasks would fit in the `info os' prefix. Ada tasks and threads are very similar, so I would treat them the same. --=20 Joel