From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5934 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2009 13:28:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5924 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2009 13:28:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:28:12 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n68DS5VK046525 ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:28:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms1.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::10]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n68DS52h042731 ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:28:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (www-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n68DS5kj069163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:28:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Pedro Alves'" , References: <000001c9ffce$8b9b81e0$a2d285a0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200907081423.14012.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200907081423.14012.pedro@codesourcery.com> Subject: RE: [RFA] Add "inf" alias for "info" Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000301c9ffcf$ecec6bc0$c6c54340$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 > > The proposed patch add "inf" as an alias > > of "info", saving the hassle of retyping "info" > > after the message above. > > Why not type just "i"? It is already an alias for "info", and, > it's shorter anyway ==> less hassle. No really good reasons but, I used "inf " for years and didn't know "i " worked, I discovered it while writing the patch! But I am too used to "inf " to be able to switch to "i " easily! Pierre