From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2572 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2009 22:29:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 2564 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2009 22:29:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:29:38 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n5PMTRq2087656 ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:29:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms3.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::12]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n5PMTRMt068341 ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:29:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (lec67-4-82-230-53-140.fbx.proxad.net [82.230.53.140]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n5PMTPkG026134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:29:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" Cc: , References: <000501c9f12b$68c860e0$3a5922a0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200906210227.48175.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000301c9f28f$aa284220$fe78c660$@u-strasbg.fr> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000001c9f5e4$676a0600$363e1200$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00691.txt.bz2 > So, on balance, I'd suggest to fix the testsuite not to expect this > Posix semantics, at least not on DOS/Windows. Hi Eli, does that mean that I should make the change specific to Dos/Windows targets? I am not sure to know how to do that cleanly... Or should I just commit my patch as is, the purpose of the test is completely different anyhow. Pierre Muller Pascal language support maintainer for GDB