From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, ian@wasabisystems.com
Subject: Re: C++/Java regressions
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031125170632.D8D974B409@berman.michael-chastain.com> (raw)
[Ian might not need any more of this ...]
I asked:
mec> What is the correct output when a breakpoint is taken on
mec> "A::bar(int) const" ?
After some deliberation, I decided that I want the test script
to be liberal in what it accepts.
class A {
public:
...
int foo (int arg);
int bar (int arg) const;
};
When a breakpoint is taken on A::foo, the script currently accepts:
Breakpoint N, A::foo (this=...)
Breakpoint N, A::foo(int) (this=...)
When a breakpoint is taken on A::bar, the script currently accepts:
Breakpoint N, A::bar (this=...)
Breakpoint N, A::bar(int) const (this=...)
I am going to keep all these patterns and add another pattern to
accept what gdb is printing today:
Breakpoint N, A::bar const (this=...)
If someone wants to spend time on making gdb's output better here,
that is okay with me. But I decided that it's too low priority for
my attention and the list bandwidth.
David C is that okay with you?
Patch to follow.
Michael C
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-25 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-25 17:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2003-11-25 17:14 ` David Carlton
2003-11-25 17:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-26 22:48 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-26 21:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-26 22:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 22:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-26 22:34 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 21:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-26 21:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-25 15:33 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-25 14:49 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-25 15:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-25 4:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-11-25 17:54 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-25 1:37 David Carlton
2003-11-25 3:58 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 4:04 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 15:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-26 21:05 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-11-26 21:11 ` David Carlton
2003-11-26 21:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-26 21:32 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-12-01 16:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-30 2:57 ` Jim Blandy
2003-11-30 3:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031125170632.D8D974B409@berman.michael-chastain.com \
--to=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ian@wasabisystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox